Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men Essay -- Movie, Film, Twelve Angry Men

In the 1957 classic 12 infuriated Men, group dynamics be portrayed through a control board deliberation. Group dynamics is concerned with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles each character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought unneurotic in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the truth are just a few characteristics of group dynamics at work. The whole spectrum of humanity is represented in this movie, from the bigotry of jurywoman No.10 to the coldly analytical No.4. Whether they brought good or bad qualities to the jury room, they all affected the outcome. At the outset, el regular(a) jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at the trial. When a group becomes too confident and fails to think realistically about its task, groupthin k can occur. Since it takes a perennial time to communicate and reach a consensus in a group, decision making in a group is time-consuming. Therefore, when groups want to achieve a promptly decision, as several jurors were eager to do, they make riskier decisions than individuals. Since not any individual is completely accountable for the decision, members will have a tendency to accept much extreme solutions. Only one brave juror refused to vote guilty. Juror 8 refused to fall into the groupthink trap and ultimately saved an innocent mans life. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it necessary to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a discussion of the particular facts of the case, but also an intense ex... ...quires looking at matters objectively, analyzing the evidence, and coming to a fair conclusion. And even if the jurors personal baggage was not look into at the door, the shift into positive gr oup dynamics allowed the jury members to overcome interpersonal conflicts and prejudices to reach consensus on the innocence of an alleged murderer. Bibliography 1. Kolb, David A., and Joyce S. Osland and Irwin Mr. Rubin. Organizational Behavior An existential Approach. 6th edition. New Jersey Prentice Hall, 1995 Pages 98-100 2. Sarah Trenholm. Thinking Through Communication An Introduction To The Study Of Human Communication. 2nd edition. Allyn and Bacon A Viacom Company, 1995 Pages 196 - 205 3. Damian Cannon, a review by. 12 Angry Men (1957) Copyright Movie Reviews UK 1997 4. Steve Rhodes, a review by. 12 Angry Men (1957) Copyright 1997 Steve Rhodes