The Myth of Cyberterrorism

Problems in economy With using viruses, worm has costed to the regular army $15 bil 2 Mind hackers targeted government computers Content and Organisation commemorate the paragraph below taken from the text Myth of Cyberterrorism and analyse the satisfy and organisation. The main reason for this controversy is that cyber- brats have not materialized as a national security threat, purge granted that there have been many few incidents with at least some potential for grave consequences.Interestingly enough, both hypers and de-hypers tend to agree on this point. But while the first convention assumes that vicious attacks that wreak havoc and paralyze whole nations atomic number 18 imminent, more(prenominal) cautious researchers often point to the practical difficulties of a serious cyberattack (Ingles-le Nobel, 1999), interrogative sentence the assumption of critical infrastructure vulnerabilities (Lewis, 2002 Smith, 1998, 2000), or point to unclear benefits of cyber- attacks fo r terrorist groups (Barak, 2004).Despite this caution, however, even the second group contends that one cannot afford to shrug off the threat (Denning, 001 a) due to unclear and rapid tuture technological development as hale as dynamic change of the capabilities of terrorism groups themselves (Technical Analysis Group, 2003). To summarize the fight in a nutshell due to too many uncertainties concerning the scope of the threat, experts are unable to conclude whether cyber-terror is fact or fiction, or, since they are unwilling to dissolve the threat completely, how long it is likely to remain fiction.